A confession, and a decision.
I've spent 25 years helping ambitious B2B companies build authority, trust, and pipeline. Seven years ago I started an agency that focused entirely on LinkedIn. We wrote every message, every post, every reply by hand - one client at a time. It worked well. Clients got results, and we were proud of the work.
Then something started to shift. AI got genuinely good at the craft parts of what we did. Drafting content. Writing outreach sequences. Varying tone by audience. I sat with that for a while (longer than I probably should have, if I'm honest), and eventually accepted what it meant: the agency model - high headcount, high prices for high-touch delivery - was not going to hold up.
"AI could do 90% of the work just as well as our wonderful team. The right move wasn't to pretend otherwise. It was to ask: what does that leave for humans to do?"
The answer was the stuff that actually required judgement. Setting the right strategy. Making sure the output sounded like the client, not like a template. Catching when a campaign was drifting in the wrong direction and doing something about it. That's what a good account manager does. That's what an AI, for now at least, cannot.
So we started building Maistro. The vision was straightforward: let the technology handle the repetitive parts, and keep humans focused on what they're genuinely better at. Not as a marketing line, but as an actual operating model. Every Maistro client has a real account manager who knows their business, reviews their campaigns, and comes to them with suggestions rather than waiting to be asked.
The result is something that delivers what a proper agency used to charge significant fees for, at a monthly subscription price that makes it accessible to the kind of founders and professionals who actually need it most.
That's the whole story, really. I saw what was coming, made a decision, and built the thing I wished had existed when I was running the agency.